increased by times in
Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2024 9:59 am
) in the real environment. Not to mention anything else, if you wear headphones and run outside, the human on the other side may not be able to hear you clearly. If people can't hear clearly, they can guess how the robot faces the interference of the real environment and ensures accurate perception under the premise of interference. Otherwise, wouldn't it be unusable? The second is the algorithm. The environment faced by this kind of robot is more complex than that of intelligent native applications. It is the real entire physical world + digital world, but the potential computing power behind it is lower than that of the large model on the cloud.
If i is right.Then it seems impossible, at least a japan cell number new set of ideas and new models are needed. Once this catastrophe is over, I will really become the last invention of mankind. The various fantasies of science and technology philosophers can only become reality at this point. This kind of robot completely loses its economic value once human physical strength is gone. During the previous interview at Peking University, following Professor Hou Hong’s statement that people and I should not be regarded as a zero-sum game, I expressed another brain-opening point of view: If the economy is to continue to improve every year, there is probably a way, but it will end.
But if the total economic volume is to be existing methods will fail. The problem is that with a growth rate of 5%, all resources may be exhausted and the Dyson sphere cannot be built. At this time, this kind of strong artificial intelligence is needed. If general-purpose robots are really made, our entire economic system may undergo fundamental changes.For example, now we are doing mass production and then retail. If there are general robots, almost all industries can produce on demand. Users participate in product design, then production and manufacturing, and then delivery.
If i is right.Then it seems impossible, at least a japan cell number new set of ideas and new models are needed. Once this catastrophe is over, I will really become the last invention of mankind. The various fantasies of science and technology philosophers can only become reality at this point. This kind of robot completely loses its economic value once human physical strength is gone. During the previous interview at Peking University, following Professor Hou Hong’s statement that people and I should not be regarded as a zero-sum game, I expressed another brain-opening point of view: If the economy is to continue to improve every year, there is probably a way, but it will end.
But if the total economic volume is to be existing methods will fail. The problem is that with a growth rate of 5%, all resources may be exhausted and the Dyson sphere cannot be built. At this time, this kind of strong artificial intelligence is needed. If general-purpose robots are really made, our entire economic system may undergo fundamental changes.For example, now we are doing mass production and then retail. If there are general robots, almost all industries can produce on demand. Users participate in product design, then production and manufacturing, and then delivery.